THAT EVERYONE NEEDS TO BE A VISIBLE MEMBER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE OFFICIAL TEACHING OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND NOT JUST THE VIEW OF FR.LEONARD FEENEY

So powerful is the secular liberal media that they have ‘catechized’ generations of Catholics over half a century. The leftist, mainstream media keeps repeating that Fr. Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for saying everyone needs to be a visible member of the Church. The media does not say that everybody needing to be a visible member of the Catholic Church, is the official teaching of the Church according to magisterial documents. It cannot state this. Since the lie is their leftist ideological position.

It is made to seem that Fr. Leonard Feeney held a different view from that of the teaching authority of the Catholic Church. The magisterium, the teaching authority of the Church, it is made to appear, accepts ‘the mainstream teaching’ of the non-Catholic owners of the media.

They suggest that Fr. Leonard Feeney was wrong with a ‘minority view’. They imply that Catholics know of people saved in Heaven, in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. So these cases known in general, are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They are allegedly exceptions to the Fr. Leonard Feeney’s interpretation. If there can be known exceptions to the dogma, example the baptism of desire, then it is assumed that Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong. Also it is assumed that he was excomunicated for this error.

So the media indicates that the Catholic Church does not teach anymore the error of Fr. Leonard Feeney. Why? Since we know, it is assumed, of visible cases of the baptism of desire.

In other words: deny the dogma, deny the official teaching of the Catholic Church. Since we know of cases in Heaven in general, saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance.

The media is to never let out the secret that these cases are known only to God and are unknown to us humans.If they did reveal the secret, over 50 years of propaganda would come to an end.

So they will never state that Fr. Leonard Feeney’s interpretation of the salvation dogma outside the church no salvation, is the official teaching of the Catholic Church.

Those who can discern realize that Fr. Leonard Feeney held the same doctrinal teaching on salvation as Jesus, the Church Fathers, and the popes including Pope Pius XII, the Church Councils which defined the dogma, and the saints who were faithful to the dogma, the Catechisms, Vatican Councils and the Bible according to the Catholic Church. This was Jesus’ teaching. (Mk.16:16, Jn 3:5 etc)

For salvation every one with no exception needs to be a visible, formal member, i.e with Catholic Faith and the baptism of water, is the official Catholic teaching for all Catholics, including those who attend the Novus Ordo Mass in the different languages.-Lionel Andrades

FR.LEONARD FEENEY HELD THE SAME DOCTRINE AS THE CHURCH FATHERS, POPES, COUNCILS,CATECHISMS, VATICAN COUNCILS I AND II AND MICHAEL VORIS AT REAL CATHOLIC TV.COM
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/frleonar-feeney…

IF THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949 CONSIDERED THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AS A DEFACTO EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA IT WOULD BE AN OBJECTIVE ERROR: WE DON’T KNOW ANY SUCH CASE
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/if-letter-of-ho…

ALL THE CATECHISMS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAVE TAUGHT THE RIGORIST VIEW OF EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/all-catechisms-…

The Vatican Councils of the Catholic Church have clearly taught that formal membership in the Catholic Church IS absolutely necessary for salvation
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/vatican-council…-

No pope has said that those saved in invincible ignorance are known to us and so are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/no-pope-has-sai…

Being saved in invincible ignorance is not a defacto exception to the teaching of Cantate Domino Council of Florence
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/being-saved-in-…

Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church is in agreement with the rigorist interpretation of outside the church no salvation
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/02/blog-post.html

Whether they know it or not non Catholics with the stain of Original Sin on their soul and mortal sins committed in that state and without the Sacraments outside of which there is no salvation, are all oriented to Hell
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/whether-they-kn…

When one is clear that all those saved are explicit only in Heaven it is not difficult to affirm ‘the formal necessity of belonging to the Church’
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/when-one-is-cle…

Ultra Traditonalists in accord with Vatican Council II on extra ecclesiam nulla salus
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/ultra-traditona…

DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACH THAT MUSLIMS ARE SAVED ?
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/does-catholic-c…

CATHOLIC PRIESTS IN ROME AGREE WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY: THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search/label/Catholic priests

NON CATHOLICS CAN BE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE, BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND IT DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS- Daphne McLeod, Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice, England
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/non-catholics-c…

RADICI CRISTIANE SAYS CLEARLY CHURCH HAS NOT CHANGED LITERAL MEANING OF DOGMA AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE AND BAPTISM OF DESIRE ARE NOT DEFACTO EXCEPTIONS.
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/radici-cristian…

The Catholic Legate - John Pacecho, Art Sippo,Peter Vere contradict each other ?
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/catholic-legate…

VATICAN RECOGNIZES DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS WITH RIGORIST INTERPRETATION : INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE (LG 16) AND BAPTISM OF DESIRE ARE NOT DEFACTO EXCEPTIONS
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/vatican-recogni…

eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/that-everyone-n…

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

JESUIT SUPERIOR GENERAL REVIEW THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE : THERE IS NO KNOWN CASE OF A PERSON SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE WHICH IS VISIBLE

In a prepared statement for the press the former Jesuit added: "The conscience difficulty is that the diocese of Boston, under the auspices of Archbishop Cushing, and Boston College, under the auspices of Father John J. McEloney, S.J., both notably ignorant in the field of Catholic theology ... are teaching that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church." - Father Feeney Is Dismissed From Jesuit Order by Rome

www.thecrimson.com/…/father-feeney-i…

We now know that the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Reverend John J. McEleney S.J. the former Provincial of the New England branch of the Society of Jesus were wrong in assuming that those saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance are explicitly known to us,that they are real and visible cases and so they contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr.Leonard Feeney.

Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct in saying that there is no baptism ofdesire or invincible ignornance cases that we know of and so they are not exceptions to the dogma defined three times.

Fr.Leonard Feeney was unjustly deprived of his faculties to offer Mass and hear Confession when he was only affirming the centuries old interpretation of the dogma.

The Archbishop of Boston and the Jesuit Superior General did not issue a clarification when the Boston newspapers reported that the Church had changed its ancient teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation.

Instead the Archbishop and the Jesuits began teaching that there was salvation outside the church for those saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire not mentioning that these cases were accepted only on principle de jure and so did not contradict the dogma which indicated that all non Catholics need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.

Pope Pius XII in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 affirmed ‘the dogma’ the ‘infallible teaching’. The dogma CantateDomino, Council of Florence indicates that all non Catholics in Boston and the rest of the world need to convert into the Catholic Church. This was exactly the teaching of Fr.Leonard Feeney for which he was being transferred and silenced.

Even though the Letter of the Holy Office supported the priest the excommunication was not listed and the media was allowed to state that Fr.Leonard Feeney was condemned by the Hly Office.

Justice needs to be done by the present Superior General of the Jesuits Superior General is the Reverend Father Adolfo Nicolás..-Lionel Andrades

_____________________________________________________________________________

Father Feeney Is Dismissed From Jesuit Order by Rome

Refused to Take Holy Cross Post

By Brenton WELLING Jr.,

Published: Saturday, October 29, 1949

Father Leonard Feeney last night was dismissed from the Jesuit Order.

His discharge, the latest event in his dispute with the Catholic authorities, came in the form of a decree from Rome signed by The Very Reverend Jean Baptiste Janssens, S.J., General of the order,

The decree arrived at St. Benedict's Center at 6 p.m. in a registered letter from The Reverend John J. McEleney S.J. Provincial of the New England branch of the Society of Jesus.

Judicial Process

Father Feeney announced his own dismissal at a press conference last night. He translated from the Latin a sentence of the decree, which said: "Your dismissal from the Society of Jesus through judicial process has been approved."

Father Feeney, who is the chaplain of St. Benedict's commented, "The reason is because I will not leave St. Benedict's Center." He refused to do so in August, 1948, when he was ordered by the Jesuits to join the faculty of Holy Cross.

The reason for his disobedience, Father Feeney said last night, was a "conscience difficulty which Father McEloney will not listen to."

Explains Difficulty

In a prepared statement for the press the former Jesuit added: "The conscience difficulty is that the diocese of Boston, under the auspices of Archbishop Cushing, and Boston College, under the auspices of Father John J. McEloney, S.J., both notably ignorant in the field of Catholic theology ... are teaching that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church."

Archishop Cushing declined to comment on this statement last night, and Father MeEleney could not be reached.

Father Feeney's insistence that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church has been the cause of the con- troversy which has gene on between the Archbishop and the Jesuits, on the one hand, and Father Feeney, on the other, since October 1947. Last January Father Feeney was "deprived on his faculties" by Archbishop Cushing. This meant that he could no longer say Mass or hear confession.

Despite this and the more recent punishment, Father Feeney announced last night, "I shall continue as a Catholic priest, loyal and devoted to the Church and to the Pope, at St. Benediet's Center."

The faculty and students of St. Benedict's in a statement signed by the secretary of the School, said last night; "Many of us have at one time or another been associated with Jesuit institutions, and know that their policies of late are motivated more by political expediency than by Christian charity. -Harvard Crimson online.
eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/…/jesuit-superior…

The infiltrators of the Church decades ago began their newest quest to destroy the HOLY, the TRUTH, the APOSTOLIC tradition of our Church. And so today (no help from birth control pill, legalized abortion) we find ourselves with modernist clergy who instead of trying to Save Souls, rather not Offend them with speaking the truth of what our Faith and Teachings teach.
When we have liberal-minded clergy and feminist "nuns" running the chancels, parishes, schools and other "catholic" organizations, how can our Catholic Tradition return to its former beauty of reverence, holiness, respect, modesty, open to life, sanctity of marriage, etc?
I use to think that until all the woodstock generation of clergy die out, then we may see our Church return to its splendor.
The fact that so many priests and bishops are afraid to speak the truth or they themselves are of a liberal mindset, then how can we follow something that is barren, fruitless, unholy? Where have the "shepherds" been leading the flocks that they are suppose to be leading toeternal salvation,... not only with their words but by their example.
If the world does not pray as Our Lady has so often requested, than we continue to reap the effect of this ugly cancer that has permeated our Church and the world. Even the priests MUST pray more...I've listened to priests tell me that there are many (priests) who don't even care to read their breviary, to pray the office.
Only by God's just hand and His grace can our Church and the world be restored back to a moral and god-fearing nation.

It's funny to me that tradionalists like Voris and others of the clergy never look to the root cause of these abuses: maybe..... VATICAN II!!!
Americanism? How about Protestantism! When the sacred was taken away from us: our alters, statues, alter rails, tabernacle, stained glass, and we were forced to worship Our Lord in a sterile, auditorium with a wooden table, a few candles, and Father Bob with a microphone in his hand as if a cruise director, what do you expect of the behavior of the laity? That is all fine for our protestant friends but not for the followers of the Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic church. I am blessed to have access to a Tridentine mass, Gregorian chant, and an orthodox priest who is not afraid to speak the truth. After years of attending Novus Ordo masses, I left the Church for a period, only to rekindle my faith in the Latin Mass.