Full text: Di Noia sends letter to SSPX priests
Advent 2012 Your Excellency and dear Priestly Brothers of the Fraternity of St. Pius X, Our recent declaration (28 October 2012) affirmed in a public and authoritative manner that the Holy See’s …More
Advent 2012
Your Excellency and dear Priestly Brothers of the Fraternity of St. Pius X,
Our recent declaration (28 October 2012) affirmed in a public and authoritative manner that the Holy See’s relations with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X remain open and hopeful. Until now, apart from its official pronouncements, the Holy See has for various reasons refrained from correcting certain inaccurate assertions regarding its conduct and competence in these interactions. A time is rapidly approaching, however, when in the interest of truth the Holy See will be compelled to address some of these inaccuracies. Particularly dolorous are statements that impugn the office, and person, of the Holy Father and that, at some point, would demand some response.
Recent assertions by persons holding significant positions of authority within the Fraternity cannot but cause concern about the realistic prospects for reconciliation. One thinks in particular of interviews given by the District Superior …More
Your Excellency and dear Priestly Brothers of the Fraternity of St. Pius X,
Our recent declaration (28 October 2012) affirmed in a public and authoritative manner that the Holy See’s relations with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X remain open and hopeful. Until now, apart from its official pronouncements, the Holy See has for various reasons refrained from correcting certain inaccurate assertions regarding its conduct and competence in these interactions. A time is rapidly approaching, however, when in the interest of truth the Holy See will be compelled to address some of these inaccuracies. Particularly dolorous are statements that impugn the office, and person, of the Holy Father and that, at some point, would demand some response.
Recent assertions by persons holding significant positions of authority within the Fraternity cannot but cause concern about the realistic prospects for reconciliation. One thinks in particular of interviews given by the District Superior …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
thelastconvert
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
No surprise here. Please remember this is what he was assigned to do. Reflect for a moment on from where he comes. He is a product of the rapidly dissolving Dominican Order who were led, since VII, by men just like this. Members but non followers of St. Dominic who directly support the self destructive teaching of the VII Church and of course of their own order. We can expect this until this type …More
No surprise here. Please remember this is what he was assigned to do. Reflect for a moment on from where he comes. He is a product of the rapidly dissolving Dominican Order who were led, since VII, by men just like this. Members but non followers of St. Dominic who directly support the self destructive teaching of the VII Church and of course of their own order. We can expect this until this type of leader is no longer in a position of authority. This type of leader is simply a single minded person who will not adjust to the reality of our times. The reality being that VII is a failure and is leading to the loss of many souls. I believe that "parentsfortruth" has a good understanding of who this man is.
parentsfortruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
This looks to me like one of the tactics of the Freemasons. The SSPX is not angry, or anything else. They've never left the Church. The Vatican should be asking for their apology and return to the Church, not the other way around. "Tradidi quod et accepi-I have transmitted to you what I have received." The Vatican has not done this.