Jack has been openly gay since he was 13,[15] and discussed that in interviews with The New Civil Rights Movement,[16] the London Evening Standard,[17] and Washington's MetroWeekly,[15] among others. When asked to be interviewed about his sexual orientation, Jack responded, "That sounds awesome! I’m openly gay and one of my biggest hopes is that I can help inspire other LGBT youth to get involved in STEM [Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics]. I didn't have many [gay] role models [in science] besides Alan Turing."[16]

Wheter that boy’s disposition and success come from himself or not…

Study places and training for all scientific disciplines are given to those who will sign up and assure, that they will not oppose any action necessary to keep the abortionmarket alive! Nurses, midwives, paramedics, doctors: it goes from the secretary to the Chief Executive Officer in all disciplines. Same for all other liveselling/livekilling markets of that kind.

Scientists who oppose that markets have invented more and better in the past 40 years than Andraka. But they will not be honored for the plain and a pure source of their knowledge is unpopular. Their minds, hearts and souls are grounded in God Allmigthy the King of all.

But obviously: HIS kingdom has no representative in the Vatican.

Homo acts are always intrinsically evil, a perversion and sterile. The same is not true with hetero---even a rape—the law regarding procreations was broken and civil laws were violated---but offspring could occur. The mindset of a homo about themselves and that of God is totally different than that of hetero.

Just like people that have sexual attraction for animals---this is not normal to think this way, even if they do not act upon it. =--same with the sodomite.

The point of this post---is the Vatican should not endorse a publically proclaimed gays in any manner---for being gay in itself a position that is opposed to God’s teachings---to publically proclaim it and then have Christ Church give awards to those that do ---send a evil message to all about God and offends God gravely.

Ben Martin: I don't disagree at all about what you say about sodomy being unnatural vice and disorder, and homosexual acts are always evil. Holy Cannoli truly is attacking me and jeering me for no coherent reason.

Heterosexual feelings are not disordered in the same way as homosexual ones. Heterosexual feelings have the capacity of being used in the right way in a loving relationship as good intended, while homosexual feelings do not have this capacity. That is the difference.

Every heterosexual desire for pornography, masturbation, sex with prostitutes, sex with someone who is someone's else wife, etc. however, is also a desire for what's evil - it is not just "lust" in the person, if we work under the definition you give of wanting something that is good too much, because even a little bit of those things is still evil and therefore any desire for such things is "disorder and perversion"; perhaps one can say that it may be a shadow of a desire for what's good, like how the desire for pornography in one hidden sense is just the warping of the desire that God's placed inside a man for a wife, but really you could just as equally say about homosexual feelings that the homosexual's desires for someone of the same sex is just a warping, through psychological causes or whatever, of the desire that God placed inside of the person for a wife.

There is no one in the world who does not have disordered desire for something - that is the consequences of original sin from Adam. For one person it is perhaps the desire to have sex with someone of the same sex, for another it is the desire to masturbate while thinking of some pretty movie star, for another it is the desire to hurt or insult someone who did nothing wrong... they are all disordered desires and corruptions of God's original creation that resulted from original sin. Each one is an orientation that bends people towards evil.

Every heterosexual sexual act outside of marriage is also perversion of the sexual faculties, and is gravely sinful in the eyes of the church. This is not my own thinking; simply read the catechism, read what any of the saints wrote about this topic, what the magisterium has always maintained, etc. A catholic boy who has sex with his girlfriend is not even allowed to take communion, under any circumstances, according to what the catechism says. St Leonard of Port Maurice, who I think is honoured in the American church either tomorrow or the next, is the patron saint of confessors and he taught that confessors should refuse absolution to people who had had sex with those whom they are not married with but whom they would not break off contact with.

The only form of sexual activity which is good is that between a man and woman who are joined in marriage. Everything else is sinful and a warping of God's order, disbelieving that is a rejection of catholic teaching.

God bless,

Reesorville,

Sodomy is unnatural vice and disorder—which never is allowed or acceptable=the act is always evil. The orientation is not that of God’s. It is sterile and self gratification form of being—where you use God’s creation for your own pleasure, with not fruit or ability to have offspring. Mentality is foreign to the creation of God---it like someone thinking they are Pink Elephant and that is ok as long as they do not act on it---the whole orientation is wrong to God. The sin of lust does not existed with sodomy---it is disorder and perversion—not lust. For lust is the unbridled control or excess of something that is good—that is taken too far. Perverse sexual (sodomy) feelings for a man for another man----is never acceptable in God eyes. But that is not true with heterosexuals---God encourage man to desire a women—if controlled within His laws and then marriage. None of this is ever true with gays---just the mindset is wrong.

Heterosexuality is NOT an unnatural vice or perversion and is how God made us. In the proper context can be one the most pleasing things man can give God---souls for heaven and making saints. The orientation for man to love and respect women is never wrong, it is encouraged with God and is when in matrimony is blessed and holy. It is like wine ---it can be used for the Sacrifice of the Mass or a tool to destroy someone and their soul when abuse or used to excess. Sodomites ---cup is not filled with wine—so it cannot be pleasing to God—it filled with poison or gasoline from the on set---and even the flumes and thoughts will kill you and your soul.

Get help.

Holy Cannoli:

The catechism is really clear on this point: all forms of sexual activity outside of marriage is gravely sinful. They all lead to hell. It doesn't matter if it is homosexual or heterosexual. They are both evil.

Being a real catholic means to follow Jesus, which means to love your neighbour. You judge me and know absolutely nothing at all about me, and you tease me as though as I were gay, when all I did was to tell you that we ought to be concerned about heterosexual sexual depravity as well.

Blessed are those who love the law of the Lord. I love God and my neighbour and that is the greatest blessing in my life. I am thankful to God that I do not curse you like the way you treat me; that is the greatest blessing to me.

I have all the help I need, already. Turn to God and you will get it too.

Homo apologists, who try to create a moral equivalence between homosexual activity (which is evil and disordered in all cases) and heterosexuality (which is NOT evil in all circumstances), have an obvious agenda. “Objectively disordered” (the term used in the catechism) is a kinder gentler euphemism for saying the homo crowd are mentally screwed up.

Get help.

Carry on. I'm done with you.

Rome should never recongnize, gives awards or honor to any one that publicly proclaims themselves gay or a sodomite---it is huge scandal and wrong.

Would there be any debate if kid was a practicing Nazi, that said he kills Jews and hates them---some how that is offensive--but not the other? Especially in God's eyes?

Holy Cannoli: "Despite what you homo apologists preach, homosexual activity is evil under all circumstances, every time with no exceptions."

Am I an apologist for homosexuality?

I wrote that all forms of sex outside of marriage are mortal sins; this is obviously including homosexual relations. You seemed to have completely missed the point of what I wrote.

I didn't say that the church should not condemn homosexual acts. I said that it needs to widen its scope and attack all forms of sexual activity outside of marriage. Rather than being scandalized only when it is gay, we ought to be scandalized when it is straight too.

If people only get riled up because of gay sex, and it doesn't care or protest about the heterosexual prostitution, heterosexual teen sex, heterosexual sex with those you are not married to, heterosexual masturbation, heterosexual pornography, etc. that pervades our culture, then there is something really wrong with this. That is the whole point.

'Never, ever, adopt the language of the enemy.'

True dat.

A couple of other words that have been co-opted by the left:

Racist
Racism
Merry Christmas Happy Holidays

I'm not going to allow the lamestream media tell me that homosexual is now gay. It's not gay. It's a disgustingly filthy form of self-destruction that has been allowed to gain acceptance in every section of our society including the Catholic Church.

Racist is another term that the communists in the media and the race pimps like Sharpton and Jackson use to bully a company or a group that they deem is too white and needs to make a contribution to their respective retirement plans.

Here's my definition of racism.

Racism is the indisputable fact that if some night I walk down a street called Martin Luther King Ave.(in any major city in the states) I will be beaten, robbed and perhaps murdered. That's racism. Racism is being attacked by black thugs because they hate whitey. Meanwhile, any of these same animals can walk in my neighborhood and will be unharmed.

"Polar Bear Hunting" is happening with regularity throughout the country. The thugs call it "Polar Bear Hunting" for obvious reasons.

usnews.nbcnews.com/…/21565494-author…

'Never, ever, adopt the language of the enemy.'"

Nor is this a small point. When the enemy - and let us name the enemy: a satanic juggernaut using perversion as its weapon of choice - defines the terms, and the opponents accept those terms, the opponents have already lost. Every time the word "gay" is used to describe this unnatural vice we concede ground. It is one of the most clever devices of the Overseers of the Pit to change the meaning of words in such a way that men call evil good and good, evil. It is that upside-down mentality of the devils, which turns Masses into Black Masses and crucifixes upside-down that drives this war on words. If we here could but succeed to convince our fellow writers to stop using that word in its perverted meaning we would have achieved something.

Even solid, thinking Christians use the word. My very dear friends this cannot go on. The sodomites laugh and smirk among themselves when they see their adversaries using their own terminology. And why shouldn't they? They see a battle, not a minor skirmish, that they have won.

Check link here for article theeye-witness.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-war-of-words.html

I think the Pope is right when he says that the church is focusing too much on gay marriage.

I'm afraid you are wrong. The fact is that if the church had been focusing "too much" on "gay marriage" you would be hearing about it during mass. But, that happens rarely in most Catholic parishes with some Courageous Exceptions.

Despite what you homo apologists preach, homosexual activity is evil under all circumstances, every time with no exceptions. Plus, homosexuality is a crime against the natural law. Not true for heterosexual activity.

The ‘use which is against nature’ to which St. Paul refers is any type of sexual act that is not the natural type. In particular, in this passage, Paul condemns homosexual acts, sexual acts between persons of the same gender. Homosexual sexual acts, whether between two men or two women, are disgraceful and morally depraved; this type of sexual act is intrinsically evil and always gravely immoral. (Romans 1: [26], [27], [28].

It would be better if the church stopped focusing on attacking gay marriage...

How nice! Elton John has become a member of Gloria.tv.

There are a lot of people in the church who receive public honours who have sex with those they are not married to who are heterosexuals. They are just as scandalous as this boy, but unlike him, they are catholic adults and ought to be held to an even higher standard. All sexual activity outside of marriage is a mortal sin in the church's teaching; it doesn't matter whether it be homosexual or heterosexual. If this boy is sexually active then he cannot receive communion, but there are likewise millions of catholic teens having sex with their girlfriend or boyfriend who likewise cannot receive communion according to what the church teaches and yet still do. Why is it only a scandal, however, if the subject is homosexual?
When they taught children in schools that it was OK to be gay this was a scandal to many Catholics. But, why wasn't it a scandal when they taught kids about it being acceptable to have any sex at all while they were teens?

When gay marriage became legal in some places, it was seen as a grave evil, and it was. But why didn't people talk like this about pornography being legal? Or prostitution being legal? Where are the mass protests of catholics attacking those things? Where are the catholic lawmakers calling for their abolition? Why is it only when it is gay that the degradedness of it is recognized?

Read the catechism and study what the church teaches... any sex outside of marriage at all, even between a boy and a girl, is still a grave sin that merits hellfire.

I think the Pope is right when he says that the church is focusing too much on gay marriage. It would be better if the church stopped focusing on attacking gay marriage, and instead said the church's teaching as it was and attacked and protested all forms of sexual activity outside of marriage.

I have to agree with Holy Cannoli. Surely, there are Catholic youth who could have been given the same honor for their talent. This is nothing new here with moving their gay agenda forward. Just like the homosexual dance instructor for all the bishops while in Rio. Just like the homosexual Vatican Bank Prelate Msgr. Ricca who was caught in a 'gay lobby' scandal. I'll never understand how or why these past few popes have allowed such things...pagan worshippers in the Mass, Altar girls, Everyone handing out communion with no regard, known homo prelates. Have these popes been outnumbered by these radicals and masons these past decades, or did they think in time it would work itself out?