01:35:14
MrsOblationem
8790
The SSPX Died July 14, 2012 Fr. Pfeiffer SSPX Marian Corps SSPX Doctrinal Deceleration April 15, 2012, withdrawn but not condemned.More
The SSPX Died July 14, 2012

Fr. Pfeiffer SSPX Marian Corps
SSPX Doctrinal Deceleration April 15, 2012, withdrawn but not condemned.
HOLYSOULSACADEMY
23 MARCH 2014 +AMDG+
RESISTANCE MASS in JERSEY CITY
THIRD SUNDAY IN LENT (2014 A.D.)
5PM @ CULINARY CONFERENCE CENTER
161 Newkirk Street
MEETING ROOM 511
Jersey City, NJ 07306
CONTACT EMAIL:
stfrancescabrini@spendersintl.com
CONFESSIONS before MASS
PAX CHRISTI!More
23 MARCH 2014 +AMDG+
RESISTANCE MASS in JERSEY CITY
THIRD SUNDAY IN LENT (2014 A.D.)

5PM @ CULINARY CONFERENCE CENTER
161 Newkirk Street
MEETING ROOM 511
Jersey City, NJ 07306

CONTACT EMAIL:
stfrancescabrini@spendersintl.com

CONFESSIONS before MASS

PAX CHRISTI!
MrsOblationem
Yes, we 'all' have the right and duty to resist heresy and error. We the people are not to just sit on our hands and do nothing because the bishops refuse.
It is written: 'We ought to obey God rather than men...' Summa Theologiae, IIa LLae, Q. 104, A. 5
rhemes1582
Well YES St. Athanasius is a Great Saint!
That is the problem in a nut shell. BISHOP Athanasius had the right, and authority by God to stand against Heresy and Error. Not just the Blatant in your face error, but the LITTLE error that leads to the Great Error and then destruction.
He and Others viz the Great Saint Nicholas stood up against those that were in error, be it ignorance or malice.
What we …More
Well YES St. Athanasius is a Great Saint!
That is the problem in a nut shell. BISHOP Athanasius had the right, and authority by God to stand against Heresy and Error. Not just the Blatant in your face error, but the LITTLE error that leads to the Great Error and then destruction.
He and Others viz the Great Saint Nicholas stood up against those that were in error, be it ignorance or malice.
What we need are some courageous Bishops today, to defend Truth and the Bride of Christ. Where are they? When will they hear the call to Sacrifice?
I do know that it is to them that this weight falls. We as laymen must use every means available to us to learn and understand our faith, but these men, God's Bishops must pick the fight, for the sake of souls that they will answer for . {another quote of St.Athanasius comes to mind}
In the 4th century Catholics would be very stationary and would have to just suffer and die under whatever Bishop they had. God permitted this for a time. {The gravity of Sin and the Fall!} Today he is permitting, for a time Catholics to suffer under certain Bishops that are not faithful to the faith as transmitted to us by the Apostles and Holy Saints.
This time in God's great mercy, He has given us the ability to read, study, and learn our Faith. God has also Freed the Sacraments and the Holy Mass of 1962 for His Children. They are available to us, I know because I and my family attend them. This God has given us, and the seed is being sown.

When I speak of a great danger, being attached to something{even if it appears noble} twice removed; I am trying to say there is a real danger of a struggle that becomes man oriented. Then pride can easily hold court. I am not saying this is you, or the priest speaking.
Clearly in the end, the only True and Workable action will be from the Bishops themselves. I say this is God's will, because this is how we know our faith, and her trials through history.
We must, MUST pray for Grace; for our Bishops.
I know this is wordy but; Think of the Fishermen in the storm with Jesus..These guys were fishermen by vocation. Old Salts not timid and they knew the sea. They were afraid of shipwreck all the signs were there, but alas Jesus was in the boat, and with a word; the Storm passed away.
This is the Bride of Christ. He is right here with her. Who will fight for Her?{I have said these words myself, silly me} The Groom that's who! Christ Jesus the Infant King.

🤗
MrsOblationem
In the paragraph about Bp. Fellay's April 2012 'Doctrinal Deceleration' I meant to say, 'condemning' instead of commending. Mea culpa.
Oblationem
MrsOblationem
Yes twice removed, however remember that St. Athanasius was excommunicated and kicked out, what three or four times? This priest is no St. Athanasius but to be expelled for defending Catholic Doctrine can be considered a badge of honor yes? Remember, Faith before obedience.
Oblationem
rhemes1582
MrsOblationem
I don't envy you your struggle, now twice removed..
I don't envy any of us these days; trying to hold onto the faith, in the face of such obvious destruction of the same.
Black and White are still the same truths. They are just ignored and no longer spoken of. I think it is our job is to learn them, and know them. Teach them to our Children and wait for God to correct this mess.
More
MrsOblationem

I don't envy you your struggle, now twice removed..
I don't envy any of us these days; trying to hold onto the faith, in the face of such obvious destruction of the same.
Black and White are still the same truths. They are just ignored and no longer spoken of. I think it is our job is to learn them, and know them. Teach them to our Children and wait for God to correct this mess.
Remember time will remove all of us, from this stage,including those that look to destroy the Church, be they religious or lay.
My prayers, and sympathy to you, and yours.

May God grant us the Grace of Final Perseverance. Amen
MrsOblationem
No, this priest did not split from the SSPX, this priest was expelled from the SSPX for defending the founding principles of the SSPX. He works for the founding principles of the SSPX which is the same as saying he works for the founding principles of the Catholic Church.
What you say is true about him not wanting to be united with Rome, that is until Rome shows some signs of returning to Her …More
No, this priest did not split from the SSPX, this priest was expelled from the SSPX for defending the founding principles of the SSPX. He works for the founding principles of the SSPX which is the same as saying he works for the founding principles of the Catholic Church.

What you say is true about him not wanting to be united with Rome, that is until Rome shows some signs of returning to Her traditions and founding principles, in short Her Doctrines. Otherwise who would fight for the doctrines of the Catholic Church? Rome? Not hardly. This present pope acts more like a rock star than the Vicar of Christ, humble? Rome IS the Church (someone please explain to the Vatican that the Catholic Church does not subsist in the Catholic Church, She IS the Catholic Church). Post Vatican II popes destroy Catholic traditions as though they are ashamed of them, instead of being a sign of contradiction to the world, this post VII Church caves-in to the world.

The SSPX, Marian Corps (new name for expelled SSPX priests) promotes the primacy of Peter but not heretical popes, they are not Sedevacatists.

As for Bp. Fellay, let him defend his own abandoning of SSPX founding principles and his April 2012 'Doctrinal Deceleration' by commending it rather than 'simply' withdrawing it, to be used again?
Oblationem
rhemes1582
I think this Priest {?} argues from the wrong position. He speaks as if He is the Church {I presume he is part of the SSPX that split recently from the whole of the SSPX}
I think he expects the Catholic Church to come home to him.
Even if much of his considerations are correct about Modernism in Rome, The Church is with the Seat of Peter.
When I listen to this man speak, I can see in him the concerns …More
I think this Priest {?} argues from the wrong position. He speaks as if He is the Church {I presume he is part of the SSPX that split recently from the whole of the SSPX}
I think he expects the Catholic Church to come home to him.
Even if much of his considerations are correct about Modernism in Rome, The Church is with the Seat of Peter.
When I listen to this man speak, I can see in him the concerns I have seen vented up here on Gloria.TV about the SSPX. viz Sedevacatist or in Schism .
I see a man {or a group, if he is representive of their position} that no longer has a desire to be united with Catholic Rome.

This is a grave problem, and danger with those that align themselves with the SSPX because they want a Catholic life, and desire to protect their children from the modernist, while living out the Faith of their forefathers.
What is the grave problem? This man shows it fourth...The desire to be with the seat of Peter in Rome, is no longer even a consideration, and that they are the Church.
The Primary is wrong...Rome is the Church: The Divinely instituted Church . Even if a Pope be a Heretic Period! Once that truth is gone, then death is at the door.

I am not writing to defend Bishop Fellay, but just going by this man's remarks. I say that Bishop Fellay understands this, and to my thinking this is why HE Bishop Fellay is not a Schismatic. While this man's position seems truly in schism.

Thanks for posting it. I found it very educational.